Pages

Wednesday 29 February 2012

Kata Tenzen, committing to an attack, knife assault

What we did on Tuesday 28 February 2012

Review of Kata Tenzen in relation to previous blog.  Things of note:  Tenzen was created for complete novices.  It contains responses to all the common assaults.  It provides a continuum of response from peaceful to very reactive.  Level 1: Peaceful Response; Level 2: Peaceful receptor with finishing counters; Level 3: The ‘finish in one move’ (one punch kill) principle, but with the full understanding that such a finish may not be possible and so having the mindset to continue the defence through to a finish or opportunity to break-away and escape. 

Identified usefulness for a Level 4: Attackers executes a very natural realistic attack in accord with what the kata expects but continues as if a real situation aiming for a finish.  Start by slowing the process for safety reasons and turn the heat up as ability is gained.  A further stage (and this applies to all kata) is to transcend the bounds placed upon our defensive responses by the kata and do what is totally spontaneous and natural.  The thinking being that as our experience comes initially from the kata, we are programming ourselves to respond in a certain way.  Any ‘natural’ response will, for the most part, be identifiable with an aspect of the kata learned and assimilated to date.  This is what we call ‘worm-holing’, knowing the kata and their lessons intimately and being able to utilise any aspect from any kata, anyhow in the moment spontaneously and without conscious analytical thought.

The old formal training of past years still constitutes a millstone around our necks; it is that, or a reluctance to commit to an attack for whatever reason.  It is all too easy to fall into the trap of feeding the defender with a staged and unrealistic attack, allowing the defender to get away with not having to work hard at his or her defence.  Mistakes like punching wide in anticipation of being ‘blocked’ to the side, stopping the punch short or too great a distance to be realistic are still common mistakes.  These things may be acceptable with beginners initially but long term members should not be doing these things at all.  Of course we are cursed with the health and safety component these days, and the joy of giving someone a good sound smack because they were slow to defend are largely gone.  There is a fine line between the what I regard as the good practice of getting as near to reality as is possible safely on the one hand, and erring far too much the other way on the other.  A lot of the problems come from the ‘traditional’ formal dojo practise of the past.  The facing each other formally, bowing, taking up a long range kamae, executing a formal punch, stopping short at too great a range, leaving the punching arm in place for the defender to ‘block’ when he has finished his sandwich…  I totally accept that we are engendering a certain ethical mindset through our training.  Propriety and decorum have their important places in our art but everything exists on a continuum and if there is decorum there is also its opposite.  A violent assault ain’t decorous.  Let’s get as real as we can, accepting the different levels of competence and rules of common sense and safety.

We also took a look a armed assault again for the umpteenth time in the years that I have been training.  I came to a conclusion a long, long time ago that when faced with an assailant holding a bladed weapon (if you are ever lucky enough to know before the event), get the heck out of there.  There is a saying well worth remembering “Absence of body beats presence of mind” and you had better believe it.  I don’t care how clever you are, how many dan grades you have, how long you have trained, a blade can mean permanent disablement or even death, and you only have to make one mistake.  The importance of not being there cannot be over emphasised.  OK accepted, if I am trapped by an armed assailant I am sure not going to capitulate to the seeming inevitable, there is much that can be done on both psychological and physical levels, but I wouldn’t expect to walk away uninjured.  First and foremost always comes break-away, retreat.  I have surprised more than a few people during my life with the speed and enthusiasm with which I can run over a short distance either away from someone or after them…  i will also make the point that whatever I say, there are situational conditions to take into account, no one can predict what one will do before the event, it is too dependent upon too many things.

No comments:

Post a Comment